Moral Considerations
Most of the ethical situations were guaranteed, according to direction out of Solution No. of one’s Ministry off Health. The carry out is authorized by the Ethics and you will Research Chamber out-of the fresh Centro de Filosofia e Ciencias Humanas of your own Universidade Government would Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) (CAAE Zero. 03490118.8. and you can Protocol No. 3.). Toward front page of one’s on the internet survey, there is brand new Totally free and you can Advised Concur Label (FICT), and that exhibited information about the risks and you can great things about answering new studies, as well as the be sure out of detachment of concur, rather than prejudice and at at any time. Only those players which searched new agree alternative got the means to access the research posts. Individuals who failed to read the consent choice were rerouted so you’re able to the conclusion the questionnaire.
To research you’ll be able to differences in PCM and NCM, with respect to the sociodemographic parameters: sex, occupation, care of more youthful sisters, visibility or lack of someone, and having or perhaps not with children, reviews between groups have been made by using the Mann-Whitney You decide to try ( Table 1).
In the 1st, the partnership between PCM and you may NCM is actually analyzed and it also try discovered that PCM (Yards = ; DP = ) correlates negatively to the NCM (Meters = ; DP = ); p =
Statistically significant differences with small effect sizes were found in PCM in three categories tested: occupation (U = 37; p = .035; PS est = .47), presence/absence of partner (U = 10; p = .000; PS est = .29) and presence/absence of children (U = 21; p = .002; PS est = .44). It was observed that the participants who were unemployed (Mdn = ), who had one or more children (Mdn = ) and who were in a relationship (Mdn = ); had significantly higher levels of PCM than people who worked (Mdn = ), who had no children (Mdn = ) and who did not have a relationship (Mdn = ).
On the other hand, NCM indicated statistically significant differences with small effect sizes related to sex (U = 19; p = .000; PS est = .43) and the presence/absence of children (U = 10; p = .000; PS est = .34). It was observed that both women (Mdn = ) as for the participants who do not have children (Mdn = ) have significantly higher levels of NCM than men (Mdn = ) and participants with children (Mdn = ).
Based on the results obtained in the comparison between people who are or are not in a stable relationship, we tested the possible differences in PCM according to the type of relationship using the Kruskal Wallis test. 000). Mann-Whitney tests were used to follow up on this finding. A Bonferroni correction was applied and all effects were tested at the .02 level. PCM levels showed no differences between people who were dating and people who were married or in a stable union (U = 29; p = .039; PS est = .47). However, statistically significant differences were found in PCM levels between married and in a stable union (U = 5; p = .000; PS est = .41), of which married people (Mdn = ) had higher levels of PCM when compared to people who were in https://lovingwomen.org/sv/heta-och-sexiga-tyska-kvinnor/ a stable union (Mdn = ).
A few Spearman correlations was in fact used. 000; r = -.494; roentgen dos = .24. Regarding the second research the newest matchmaking anywhere between PCM, NCM and you can 16 individual and you can contextual details was indeed checked-out and will get noticed inside Table dos. Poor relationships was in fact found both positive and negative anywhere between PCM otherwise NCM and you may 12 of your variables checked-out. Particularly brand new sociodemographic variables: “number of siblings” and “beginning buy” plus the identity points: “conscientiousness” and you can “openness playing” displayed no extreme correlations having PCM and you can NCM.
